New research reveals the potential health risks of water fluoridation. Time to reconsider?
For interview requests, click here
Water fluoridation has returned to the forefront of public policy debates thanks to environmental lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Kennedy is expected to have a role in the Department of Health and Human Services, giving his opinion more weight than ever.
In a post to X, Kennedy wrote, “On Jan. 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S. water systems to remove fluoride from public water. Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders, and thyroid disease.”
The post links to a High Wire video interview with lawyer Michael Connett, lead attorney in a successful case against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Last September, Obama-appointed District Court Judge Edward Chen sided with Connett and mandated the EPA to more strictly regulate water fluoridation.
Chen’s ruling states, “In all, there is substantial and scientifically credible evidence establishing that fluoride poses a risk to human health; it is associated with a reduction in the IQ of children and is hazardous at dosages that are far too close to fluoride levels in the drinking water …”
| Recommended |
| For the sake of our kids, Calgary must end the anti-fluoride folly
|
| New dental care plan will exclude millions of uninsured Canadians
|
| Toothaches can contribute to debilitating headaches
|
Fluoride is a poisonous industrial byproduct, handled in its pure form by people in hazmat suits. Dealing with sodium fluoroacetate was an expense for the Aluminum Company of America before Edward Bernays helped turn it into a profitable venture. In the 1940s, Bernays, the father of modern public relations and the nephew of psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, used mass psychology and public health advocates to have fluoride in drinking water. Fluoridation opponents were dismissed as kooks ever after.
The toxicology adage “The dose makes the poison” applies. Chemicals, including drugs, can benefit health in some respects but undermine it in others. Unfortunately, recent analysis suggests that fluoridation’s “side effects” may outweigh its alleged benefits.
A recent analysis by Cochrane Reviews found that water fluoridation may provide a slight dental benefit, but less so since the mid-70s, when manufacturers commonly added fluoride to toothpaste. Fluoride reverses or stops early tooth decay by remineralizing teeth, making them stronger. It also reduces bacteria’s ability to produce acids that cause decay.
Fluoride capsules have minimal impact on teeth, indicating that fluoride’s primary benefit is topical (i.e., direct contact with teeth). This raises a significant question: while fluoride, at about one part per million, passes over the teeth before being swallowed, what effects does it have once ingested and processed by the body? After all, half of fluoride is passed through urine, while the remainder is stored in the body.
In 2020, the Institute of Technology and Business in the Czech Republic published a six-article issue dedicated to the mechanisms of fluoride toxicity. One abstract explained that “fluoride is an enzymatic poison, inducing oxidative stress, hormonal disruptions, and neurotoxicity.” The toxic effects were magnified when trace amounts of aluminum were present and “might contribute to unexpected epidemics in the future.”
Sleeplessness, hypothyroidism, and autism are conditions linked to fluoride consumption, whether from natural sources or water fluoridation. These risks were identified through statistical studies comparing health issues in fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas, biochemical analyses, and human and animal studies.
In 2019, researchers from Canadian and U.S. universities tested over 500 Canadian women for fluoride levels in their urine throughout their pregnancies. Their study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), found that for each milligram of fluoride per litre in the mother’s urine, IQ dropped 4.5 points in their male children tested at ages three to four years.
Christine Till, a professor in the Department of Psychology at York University in Toronto, told CNN, “At a population level, that’s a big shift. That translates to millions of IQ levels lost.”
Ashley Malin, an assistant professor in the University of Florida’s Epidemiology Department, had similar findings in her Florida study, published in JAMA in 2024.
“There is evidence that fluoride exposure has been associated with the diseases [and] disorders that RFK listed, but with caveats,” Malin told the Virginia Mercury in a recent article. “Aside from fluoride’s impacts on neurodevelopment, I think that there is more that we don’t know about health effects of low-level fluoride exposure than what we do know, particularly for adult health outcomes,” she added.
In August, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in the United States found that fluoride levels higher than 1.5 mg/L (the highest acceptable level in Canada) are associated with lower IQs in children. The NTP said there is insufficient evidence to conclude that similar risks exist at the recommended level of 0.7 mg/L.
Montreal recently ended its water fluoridation; hopefully, other cities will follow. Only a misguided nanny state would poison young minds and old bones for the sake of people who don’t brush their teeth.
Lee Harding is a Research Fellow for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.
Explore more on Health, Dental care, Municipal politics
The views, opinions, and positions expressed by our columnists and contributors are solely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of our publication.
© Troy Media Troy Media is committed to empowering Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in building an informed and engaged public by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections, enriches national conversations, and helps Canadians learn from and understand each other better.
